Oaks v. Reno
Oaks v. Reno
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1070
ISAAC HOWARD OAKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
JANET RENO, U. S. Attorney General; JAMES S. GILMORE, III, Attorney General, Commonwealth of Virginia; DIRECTOR OF VETERAN’S ADMINISTRATION, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CA-97-237-B)
Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 25, 1998
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Isaac Howard Oaks, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Corcoran, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia; Donald Renardo Ferguson, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint in which he sought a service-connected disability pen- sion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reason- ing of the district court. Oaks v. Reno, No. CA-97-237-B (W.D. Va. Dec. 15, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.