U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Loftis v. Moore

Loftis v. Moore
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 4, 1998

Loftis v. Moore

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6812

FRANKLIN J. LOFTIS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

MICHAEL MOORE, Director; CHARLIE CONDON, At- torney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-97-2185-3-6BC)

Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: September 4, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Franklin J. Loftis, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998), and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recom- mendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny Appellant’s motion for a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Loftis v. Moore, Nos. CA-97-2185-3-6BC (D.S.C. Apr. 2 & May 21, 1998). We also deny Appellant’s motion for appointment of coun- sel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.