U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

United States v. Bumpass

United States v. Bumpass
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 3, 1998

United States v. Bumpass

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6506

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

TIMOTHY LAVON BUMPASS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-93-238, CA-97-380-1)

Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: September 3, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Peter David Goldberger, LAW OFFICES OF ALAN ELLIS, Ardmore, Penn- sylvania, for Appellant. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal- ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Bumpass, Nos. CR-93-238; CA-97-380-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 9, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.