U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

United States v. Ryce

United States v. Ryce
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 31, 1998

United States v. Ryce

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6154

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

FRANK ERNESTO RYCE, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge; John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge. (CR-89-152-N, CA-97- 1172-2)

Submitted: August 11, 1998 Decided: August 31, 1998

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frank Ernesto Ryce, Appellant Pro Se. Harvey Lee Bryant, III, As- sistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ryce, Nos. CR-89-152-N; CA-97-1172-2 (E.D.

Va. Jan. 12, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.