Young v. Maryland
Young v. Maryland
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1697
JAMES ARTHUR YOUNG, a/k/a Jim Young, Adver- tising for all living and deceased persons from tobacco related illness within USA, et al,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARYLAND, and other 49 States and Territories of United States, et al,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-98- 1260-MJG)
Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 11, 1998
Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Arthur Young, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his
civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Young v. Maryland, No. CA-98-1260-MJG (D. Md. May
6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished