Webb v. Hunt
Webb v. Hunt
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1605
PATRICIA ECKSTEIN WEBB,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JAMES B. HUNT, JR.; RUFUS L. EDMISTEN; REAGAN HALE WEAVER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-160-7-BR)
Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 11, 1998
Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patricia Eckstein Webb, Appellant Pro Se. David Roy Blackwell, As- sistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; David Scott Wisz, Patricia Pursell Kerner, BAILEY & DIXON, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing her
civil action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be
granted. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. Webb v. Hunt, No. CA-97-160-7-BR
(E.D.N.C. Mar. 17, 1998). We deny Appellant’s motion for oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished