Spence v. Fraim

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Spence v. Fraim

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1918

KEITH K. SPENCE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PAUL FRAIM, Mayor of the City of Norfolk; JAMES B. OLIVER, City Manager of Norfolk, Vir- ginia; HERBERT COLLINS, SR., Norfolk City Council; SHERMAN C. EDMONDSON, Director, Code Enforcement of the City of Norfolk; RON FILER, Code Enforcement, City of Norfolk,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-1136-2)

Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 11, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith K. Spence, Appellant Pro Se. Harold Phillip Juren, Deputy City Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Keith Spence appeals from the district court’s orders denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 1998) complaint and

denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Ac-

cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Spence

v. Fraim, No. CA-97-1136-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 5 and May 19, 1998). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished