In re: Lamont v.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

In re: Lamont v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-601

In Re: LEOPOLD F. LAMONT,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-96-101-V)

Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 11, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leopold F. Lamont, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Leopold F. Lamont filed this petition for writ of mandamus

seeking to have this court direct the district court to act on his

motion for preparation of transcripts at government expense pursu-

ant to

28 U.S.C. § 753

(f) (1994). The motion was filed in the dis-

trict court on March 23, 1998. Because the delay in the district

court has not exceeded six months, we find no unreasonable delay.

Therefore, while we grant Lamont’s motion for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis, we deny the petition for mandamus relief. We dis-

pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished