United States v. Wilson
United States v. Wilson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-4762
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WITHROW WILSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CR-96-53)
Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 10, 1998
Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rion Brady, Archdale, North Carolina, for Appellant. Mark T. Calloway, United States Attorney, Deborah A. Ausburn, Assistant United States Attorney, Richard L. Harrison, Third-Year Law Student, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Withrow Wilson filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss
the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing
notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods
are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of
Corrections,
434 U.S. 257, 264(1978) (quoting United States v.
Robinson,
361 U.S. 220, 229(1960)). In a criminal case a defendant
has ten days within which to file in the district court notices of
appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b). The
district court entered its judgment on May 5, 1997. Wilson’s notice
of appeal was filed on September 16, 1997. Appellant’s failure to
file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension of the
appeal period leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider
the merits of his appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished