Runnells v. Lappin

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Runnells v. Lappin

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7820

WILLIAM ROBERT RUNNELLS, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

HARLEY LAPPIN, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Butner, North Carolina,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief Dis- trict Judge. (CA-97-398-5-BO)

Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 10, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Robert Runnells, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief in

this action challenging the adequacy of his medical care under both

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971), and

28 U.S.C. § 2241

(1994). We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate

judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Runnells v.

Lappin, No. CA-97-398-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 3, 1997). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished