Howard v. Corcoran

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Howard v. Corcoran

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7667

DARNELL S. HOWARD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 97-1421-PJM)

Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 10, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randolph O’Neil Gregory, Sr., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Mary Ellen Barbera, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Mary- land, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his motion for enlargement of time to file a petition under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the dis-

trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. Howard v. Corcoran, No. CA-97-

1421-PJM (D. Md. Oct. 8, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-

sional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished