United States v. Henriques
United States v. Henriques
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6757
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
PHILLIP HENRIQUES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-89-P, CA-97-198-3-P)
Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 18, 1998
Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Calvin Eugean Murphy, MURPHY & CHAPMAN, P.A., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Douglas Scott Broyles, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying
his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-
pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Henriques, Nos. CR-93-89-P; CA-97-198-3-P
(W.D.N.C. May 4, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished