Warth v. Warden

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Warth v. Warden

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7085

HENRY C. WARTH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN, Mount Olive Correctional Complex; WEST VIRGINIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE,

Respondents - Appellees,

and

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Huntington. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-798-3)

Submitted: August 25, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry C. Warth, Appellant Pro Se. Chad Marlo Cardinal, Assistant Attorney General, Darrell V. McGraw, Jr., Scott E. Johnson, Dawn Ellen Warfield, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his petition filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil-

ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Warth v. Warden, No. CA-96-798-3 (S.D.W. Va. July 11, 1997). To the

extent that Appellant raises issues on appeal that were not pre-

sented in his § 2254 petition to the district court, we decline to

address the issues. See Muth v. United States,

1 F.3d 246, 250

(4th

Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished