United States v. Jones
United States v. Jones
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7174
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
HUMPHREY JONES, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CR-93-452, CA-96-1592-AM)
Submitted: August 25, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Humphrey Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Cathleen Ann Tutty, Special As- sistant United States Attorney, Bradley Stuart Lui, Senior Assis- tant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jones, Nos. CR-93-452; CA-96-1592-AM (E.D.
Va. July 29, 1997). We deny Jones’ motion for expedited treatment.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.