U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Caprood v. Moore

Caprood v. Moore
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 17, 1998

Caprood v. Moore

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6714

ROBERT J. CAPROOD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

MICHAEL W. MOORE; WILLIAM D. CATOE; LAURIE F.

BESSINGER; THOMAS MCCANTS; VAUGHN JACKSON, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-98-603-0-22BD)

Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert J. Caprood, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick Lindemann, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Caprood v. Moore, No. CA-98-603-0-22BD (D.S.C. May 1, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.