Burgess v. Mahon

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Burgess v. Mahon

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6043

LEVI BURGESS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DANIEL T. MAHON, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-1100-AM)

Submitted: August 11, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998

Before WIDENER, ERVIN, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Levi Burgess, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Levi Burgess seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court. Burgess v. Mahon, No. CA-97-1100-AM

(E.D. Va. Dec. 5, 1997). We find meritless Burgess’s claim that his

attorney rendered ineffective assistance of counsel because he

failed to argue that the Kannapolis, North Carolina, police de-

partment did not have jurisdiction to serve the search warrant at

his residence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished