U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

United States v. Hopkins

United States v. Hopkins
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 24, 1998

United States v. Hopkins

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6676

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

CLIFTON R. HOPKINS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CR-91-249-WMN, CA-97-4113-WMN)

Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 24, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clifton R. Hopkins, Appellant Pro Se. Brent Jefferson Gurney, As- sistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Clifton R. Hopkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998), which the district court construed as a motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dis- miss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Hopkins, Nos. CR-91-249-WMN; CA-97-4113-WMN (D. Md. Apr.

29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.