United States v. Hopkins
United States v. Hopkins
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6676
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CLIFTON R. HOPKINS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CR-91-249-WMN, CA-97-4113-WMN)
Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 24, 1998
Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clifton R. Hopkins, Appellant Pro Se. Brent Jefferson Gurney, As- sistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Clifton R. Hopkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2241(West 1994 &
Supp. 1998), which the district court construed as a motion filed
under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dis-
miss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United
States v. Hopkins, Nos. CR-91-249-WMN; CA-97-4113-WMN (D. Md. Apr.
29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished