United States v. Harris
United States v. Harris
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6827
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GLENN NEAL HARRIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CR-96-313, CA-97-3149-WMN)
Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 24, 1998
Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Glenn Neal Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Welsh, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying
his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1998).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-
pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Harris, Nos. CR-96-313; CA-97-3149-WMN (D.
Md. May 8, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished