Gent v. VA Intermont College
Gent v. VA Intermont College
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2076
JERRY L. GENT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
VIRGINIA INTERMONT COLLEGE,
Defendant- Appellee,
and
ANNE SHUMAKER; REBECCA WATSON,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (CA-97-101-A)
Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 23, 1998
Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry L. Gent, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Bruce Dickert, WARREN & DICKERT, Bristol, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court’s orders reassigning the
case to a different judge, granting one Defendant’s motion to dis-
miss and the remaining Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and
dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gent v. Virginia
Intermont College, No. CA-97-101-A (W.D. Va. July 14, 1997 & Feb.
10 & July 9, 1998). We also deny Appellant’s motion for a ruling
concerning service. Appellant’s claims raised on appeal concerning
an alleged violation of the Freedom of Information Act and a person
not a Defendant in the instant action are not properly before this
Court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished