United States v. Richardson
United States v. Richardson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 97-6698
CAROL RICHARDSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-90-105-N, CA-97-149-2)
Submitted: August 18, 1998
Decided: September 22, 1998
Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
_________________________________________________________________
Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
_________________________________________________________________
COUNSEL
Carol Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
_________________________________________________________________
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
_________________________________________________________________ OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Carol Richardson appeals from a district court order finding her motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1998) barred by the one-year limitations period of
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West Supp. 1998). Richardson had until April 23, 1997 to file her § 2255 motion. See Brown v. Angelone, ___ F.3d ___,
1998 WL 389030(4th Cir. July 14, 1998) (Nos. 96-7173, 96-7208). Because she filed the motion on February 3, 1997, it was not time barred. We therefore grant a certificate of appealability, vacate the district court's order, and remand for further proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre- sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished