Chidebe v. MCI Telecom Corp
Chidebe v. MCI Telecom Corp
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1287
KERRY C. CHIDEBE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 96-3169-CCB)
Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 21, 1998
Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON,* Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kerry C. Chidebe, Appellant Pro Se. Emmett Francis McGee, Jr., Theresa M. Connolly, PIPER & MARBURY, Baltimore, Maryland; Harvey D. Rumeld, MCI COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
* Judge Hamilton did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 46(d). Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in her civil action alleging violations of the
Family and Medical Leave Act,
29 U.S.C.A. §§ 2601-2654(West Supp.
1998), and the Americans with Disabilities Act,
42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213(West 1995 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Chidebe v. MCI Telecommunications Corp., No. CA-96-3169-CCB
(D. Md. Jan. 28, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished