Chidebe v. MCI Telecom Corp

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Chidebe v. MCI Telecom Corp

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1287

KERRY C. CHIDEBE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 96-3169-CCB)

Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 21, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON,* Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kerry C. Chidebe, Appellant Pro Se. Emmett Francis McGee, Jr., Theresa M. Connolly, PIPER & MARBURY, Baltimore, Maryland; Harvey D. Rumeld, MCI COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

* Judge Hamilton did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 46

(d). Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court’s order granting

summary judgment in her civil action alleging violations of the

Family and Medical Leave Act,

29 U.S.C.A. §§ 2601-2654

(West Supp.

1998), and the Americans with Disabilities Act,

42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213

(West 1995 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Chidebe v. MCI Telecommunications Corp., No. CA-96-3169-CCB

(D. Md. Jan. 28, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished