Taylor v. O&M Dredging Corp
Taylor v. O&M Dredging Corp
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2388
THOMAS LEE TAYLOR, SR.; MURRAY IVAN RESNICK,
Petitioners,
versus
O&M DREDGING CORPORATION; THE CONTINENTAL IN- SURANCE COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPART- MENT OF LABOR,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (94-534)
Submitted: August 4, 1998 Decided: October 5, 1998
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Murray Ivan Resnick, RESNICK & ABRAHAM, Baltimore, Maryland, for Petitioners. P. Scott Hedrick, HEDRICK & BLACKWELL, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Thomas L. Taylor and his attorney, Murray I. Resnick, petition
for review of the Benefits Review Board’s (Board) affirmance of the
District Director’s award of attorney’s fees. We have reviewed the
record and the District Director’s decision and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the District Di-
rector. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished