United States v. Mendez

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Mendez

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6833

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAIME MENDEZ, a/k/a Frank Quintero,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief District Judge. (CR-95-34-V, CA-98-1-5-V)

Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 15, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jaime Mendez, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Jaime Mendez seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny-

ing his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Mendez, Nos. CR-95-34-V; CA-98-1-

5-V (W.D.N.C. May 21, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished