United States v. Hill
United States v. Hill
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6650
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JULIUS WILLIAM HILL, JR., a/k/a Butch Hill,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-92-83-S, CR-92-84-S, CA-97-489-4)
Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 15, 1998
Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Julius William Hill, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Julius William Hill, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994
& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-
pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Hill, Nos. CR-92-83-S; CR-92-84-S; CA-97-
489-4 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 17, 1998). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished