United States v. Henriques

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Henriques

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6712

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EWIN HENRIQUES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-89-P, CA-97-78-3-P)

Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 15, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Ernest Gronquist, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Douglas Scott Broyles, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Ewin Henriques seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Henriques, Nos. CR-93-89-P;

CA-97-78-3-P (W.D.N.C. May 4, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished