Hogston v. Dept of Corrections
Hogston v. Dept of Corrections
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6445
JAMES M. HOGSTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 96-3804-DKC)
Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 15, 1998
Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James M. Hogston, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
James M. Hogston appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 1998) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Hogston v. Department of Corrections, No. CA-96-
3804-DKC (D. Md. Feb. 25, 1998). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished