Folks v. Jackson
Folks v. Jackson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6835
RODERICK DENNIS FOLKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
VAUGHN JACKSON; WILLIAM L. MARTIN; TERRILL CANNON, SR.; RALPH PORCHER; WAYNE RICHARDSON; EDWARD SHROPSHIRE; K. B. TAYLOR; WILLIAM BLOCKER; SANDRA F. STANLEY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-2338-2-20-AJ)
Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 15, 1998
Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roderick Dennis Folks, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick Linde- mann, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Roderick Dennis Folks appeals the district court’s order deny-
ing relief on his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 1998) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no rever-
sible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Folks v. Jackson, No. CA-97-2338-2-20-AJ (D.S.C.
May 21, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished