Folks v. Jackson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Folks v. Jackson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6835

RODERICK DENNIS FOLKS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

VAUGHN JACKSON; WILLIAM L. MARTIN; TERRILL CANNON, SR.; RALPH PORCHER; WAYNE RICHARDSON; EDWARD SHROPSHIRE; K. B. TAYLOR; WILLIAM BLOCKER; SANDRA F. STANLEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-2338-2-20-AJ)

Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 15, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roderick Dennis Folks, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick Linde- mann, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Roderick Dennis Folks appeals the district court’s order deny-

ing relief on his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 1998) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no rever-

sible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Folks v. Jackson, No. CA-97-2338-2-20-AJ (D.S.C.

May 21, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished