U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Dehoney v. Moore

Dehoney v. Moore
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 15, 1998

Dehoney v. Moore

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6640

MICHAEL F. DEHONEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

MICHAEL MOORE, South Carolina Department of Corrections Director; CHARLIE J. CEPAK, Warden; WILLIAM R. DAVIS, Warden, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-1356-4-21BE)

Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 15, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael F. Dehoney, Appellant Pro Se. Larry Cleveland Batson, Robert Eric Petersen, William Ansel Collins, Jr., Byron Ronald Roberts, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Michael F. Dehoney appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Dehoney v. Moore, No. CA-96-1356-4-21BE (D.S.C. March 26, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.