Gray v. Chesterfield-Col Hgt
Gray v. Chesterfield-Col Hgt
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1766
EUGENE GRAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CHESTERFIELD-COLONIAL HEIGHTS DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-98-8)
Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 14, 1998
Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eugene Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Latham Micas, County Attor- ney, Michael Steven Jonas Chernau, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Ches- terfield, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Eugene Gray appeals the district court’s order dismissing his
defamation and various constitutional violations claims. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Gray v. Chesterfield-Colonial Hgts. Dep’t of Soc.
Servs., No. CA-98-8 (E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 1998). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished