United States v. Piloto
United States v. Piloto
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6366
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RAUL ARMANDO PILOTO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-203-P, CA-97-194-P)
Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: October 23, 1998
Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raul Armando Piloto, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying
his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-
pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Piloto, Nos. CR-92-203-P; CA-97-194-P
(W.D.N.C. Dec. 31, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished