U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

United States v. Piloto

United States v. Piloto
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 23, 1998

United States v. Piloto

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6366

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

RAUL ARMANDO PILOTO, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-203-P, CA-97-194-P)

Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: October 23, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raul Armando Piloto, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Piloto, Nos. CR-92-203-P; CA-97-194-P (W.D.N.C. Dec. 31, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.