Hester v. Greenburg
Hester v. Greenburg
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6212
STEVEN E. HESTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
BONNIE GREENBURG, AUSA; JACK GIESE, AUSA; NORMAN E. LAMBERT, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-98-5)
Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 23, 1998
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven E. Hester, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Steven Hester appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice this action filed under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hester v. Greenburg, No. CA-98-5 (D. Md. Jan. 13, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.