Peeler v. Herlong

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit October 22, 1998

Opinion

No. 98-2099

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-1123)

Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 22, 1998

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert L. Peeler, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. James D. McCoy, III, OF- FICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Robert L. Peeler, Sr., appeals from the district court’s order

dismissing his civil action against the district court judge who

presided over his criminal trial. Our review of the record and the

district court’s opinion adopting the recommendation of the magis-

trate judge discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Peeler v. Herlong, No. CA-

98-1123 (D.S.C. July 10, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the

decisional process.