Goodman v. Jones Blechman Woltz
Goodman v. Jones Blechman Woltz
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1763
WALTER GOODMAN, sole surviving shareholder of Newport Centre Investment Corporation,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JONES, BLECHMAN, WOLTZ & KELLY, PC, A Professional Legal Corporation; EDWARD DWIGHT DAVID, Esq., Counsel to Plaintiff; KEVIN W. GRIERSON, Esq., Attorney with Jones, Blechman, Woltz and Kelly; JAMES F. THORNTON, III, Esq.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-97-31-4)
Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 22, 1998
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Walter Goodman, Appellant Pro Se. John Y. Pearson, Jr., Frank Alwin Edgar, Jr., WILLCOX & SAVAGE, Norfolk, Virginia; Steven Scott Biss, MALONEY, HUENNEKENS, PARKS, GECKER & PARSONS, Richmond, Virginia; Lloyd Lee Byrd, SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Rich- mond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court’s order granting Ap-
pellees’ motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. Goodman v. Jones, Blechman, Woltz
& Kelly, P.C., No. CA-97-31-4 (E.D. Va. Apr. 13, 1998). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished