Reliford v. Moore

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Reliford v. Moore

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7051

EPHRAIN RELIFORD, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL MOORE, Director; CHARLES M. CONDON,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-142-3-17BC)

Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 21, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ephrain Reliford, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lauri J. Soles, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Ephrain Reliford, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and denying his motion for recon-

sideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinions accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Reliford v. Moore, No. CA-98-142-3-17BC (D.S.C. June 5 &

July 9, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished