Quarles v. Smith
Quarles v. Smith
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2327
In Re: FREDERICK H. QUARLES,
Debtor. _________________________
FREDERICK H. QUARLES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
HOLLACE H. QUARLES, J. BARRETT JONES, Esquire,
Plaintiffs,
versus
W. ALAN SMITH, JR., Trustee,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-104-3, BK-94-1495-7-WA3, AP-96-3A)
Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 21, 1998
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frederick H. Quarles, Appellant Pro Se. John Ernest Falcone, SMITH & FALCONE, Lynchburg, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying his “Mo-
tion for Rehearing” in this bankruptcy action. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Quarles v. Smith, Nos. CA-96-104-3; BK-94-1495-7-WA3; AP-96-
3A (W.D. Va. Aug. 25, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished