Jones v. Plazio

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Jones v. Plazio

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6929

NICHOLAS WARNER JONES, a/k/a Charles Jones,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NICK PLAZIO, Detective; FRANK WEATHERSBEE; ANITA SMITH, DOC Case Manager,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-98- 1764)

Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 20, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nicholas Warner Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Nicholas Warner Jones appeals from the district court’s order

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 1988) com-

plaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Plazio, No. CA-98-1764

(D. Md. June 16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished