UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7041

GEORGE WILSON, III, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

M. E. RAY, FCI, Estill, South Carolina; US ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, for the District of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge; Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA- 97-632-2-OAJ)

Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: October 19, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Wilson, III, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying his mo- tion for reconsideration filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the court’s denial of reconsideration. Wilson v. Ray, No. CA-97-632-2-OAJ (D.S.C. June 10, 1998). We grant Appellant’s motion for leave to file a reply brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED