U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

United States v. Moss

United States v. Moss
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 19, 1998

United States v. Moss

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6525

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

PAULA V. MOSS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Newport News. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-94-35, CA-97-139-4)

Submitted: September 22, 1998 Decided: October 19, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paula V. Moss, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Paula V. Moss seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. United States v. Moss, Nos. CR-94-35; CA-97-139-4 (E.D. Va. Mar. 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.