Woods v. Lanham
Woods v. Lanham
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7155
CHARLES ROBIN WOODS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RICHARD A. LANHAM, SR., Commissioner of Cor- rection; FRANK C. SIZER, JR.; MARK BRADSHAW, Captain; T. PERRY, Correctional Officer; TIMMY DEAL, Major; JEFFREY JOHNSON, Correctional Officer; RONALD STOTLER, Correctional Officer; COLIN DETRICK, Correctional Officer; DENNIS HICKEY, Sergeant; FREDERICK PRITTS, Correc- tional Officer; ROBERT TICHNELL, Captain; RUSSELL ZANG, Correctional Officer; P. WILSON, Correctional Officer; JAMES H. ASHBY, Hearing Officer; BRYAN ZILER,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
L. MILLER, Correctional Officer,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 97-4019-CCB)
Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 28, 1998 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Robin Woods, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Charles Robin Woods appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 1998) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Woods v. Lanham, No. CA-97-4019-CCB (D. Md. July
23, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished