Fisher v. Young
Fisher v. Young
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7121
HERBERT G. FISHER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
S. K. YOUNG, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-694)
Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 28, 1998
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Herbert G. Fisher, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court’s order granting Appel-
lee’s motion to dismiss and denying relief on his petition filed
under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed
the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we grant in forma pauperis status but deny a
certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reason-
ing of the district court. Fisher v. Young, No. CA-97-694 (E.D. Va.
June 4, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished