United States v. Wiggins

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Wiggins

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7079

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

FELTON ANTHONY WIGGINS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Newport News. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-91-32-NN, CA-97-52-4)

Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 27, 1998

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles E. Haden, Hampton, Virginia, for Appellant. Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Timothy Richard Murphy, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Felton Anthony Wiggins appeals the district court’s order de-

nying his motion for an extension of time to appeal from the order

denying his motion for relief under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss this appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Wiggins, Nos. CR-91-32-NN;

CA-97-52-4 (E.D. Va. July 1, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished