United States v. Williams

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Williams

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6568

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANDRE WILLIAMS, a/k/a Andre Curry, a/k/a Drey,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-48, CA-97-137)

Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 26, 1998

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andre Williams, Appellant Pro Se. William David Wilmoth, United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia; Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Andre Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order de-

nying his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Williams, Nos. CR-93-48; CA-97-137

(N.D.W. Va. Mar. 30, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished