United States v. Phillips
United States v. Phillips
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6873
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
BRUCE WASHINGTON PHILLIPS, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-96-2-R, CA-97-663-R)
Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 26, 1998
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bruce Washington Phillips, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Vir- ginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Bruce Washington Phillips, Jr., seeks to appeal the district
court’s orders denying his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1998), and his motion for reconsideration. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-
ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Phillips, Nos. CR-96-2-R; CA-97-663-R (W.D.
Va. May 5; June 1, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished