Sizemore v. Holland
Sizemore v. Holland
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6611
RAY DERWOOD SIZEMORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MANFORD HOLLAND; ROY WHITE, Medical Admin- istrator; WEST VIRGINIA DIVISIONS OF COR- RECTIONS; RAYMOND SWACH, Director Parole Services; BRUCE CARTER; Chairman of the Parole Board,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-879-2)
Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 26, 1998
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ray Derwood Sizemore, Appellant Pro Se. Chad Marlo Cardinal, Assistant Attorney General, Darrell V. McGraw, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia; Leslie K. Kiser, WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Charles- ton, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on
his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have re-
viewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the
magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Sizemore v. Holland, No. CA-97-879-2 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 30, 1998). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished