Boulware v. Shoe
Boulware v. Shoe
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6877
JAMES ALVIN BOULWARE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
L. L. SHOE; UNION COUNTY CORRECTION CENTER; MICHAEL F. EASLEY,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-98-22-3-MU)
Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 26, 1998
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Alvin Boulware, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on
his petition filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 & Supp.
1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. Boulware v. Shoe, No. CA-98-22-3-MU (W.D.N.C. June 3,
1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished