Spencer v. Watson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Spencer v. Watson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6304

GEORGE LEON SPENCER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

W. WATSON; R. S. JOHNSON; L. C. PHIPPS; CAROLYN BYRAM,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-97-664-R)

Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 4, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Leon Spencer, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; George W. Wooten, Peter Duane Vieth, WOOTEN & HART, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

George Leon Spencer appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 1998) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Spencer v. Watson, No. CA-97-664-R (W.D. Va. Feb.

3, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished