Briscoe/Dickens v. Waters
Briscoe/Dickens v. Waters
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6543
ERNEST THOMAS BRISCOE/DICKENS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
LLOYD L. WATERS; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 97-1194-PJM)
Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 4, 1998
Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ernest Thomas Briscoe/Dickens, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Ernest Thomas Briscoe/Dickens seeks to appeal the district
court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
Briscoe/Dickens v. Waters, No. CA-97-1194-PJM (D. Md. Mar. 13,
1998). We further deny Briscoe’s motion for the appointment of
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished