U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

United States v. Viafara

United States v. Viafara
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 3, 1998

United States v. Viafara

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7583

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

ASNORALDO VIAFARA, a/k/a Asnoraldo Viafara Cundumi, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CR-96-86-A, CA-96-1845-AM)

Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 3, 1998

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Asnoraldo Viafara, Appellant Pro Se. Rebeca Hidalgo Bellows, As- sistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Viafara, Nos. CR-96-86-A; CA-96-1845-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 23, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.