Morrissey v. Jackson
Morrissey v. Jackson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1550
MICHAEL J. MORRISSEY; CATHERINE M. JACKSON,
Petitioners - Appellants,
versus
GREER JACKSON,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-98-87)
Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 3, 1998
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Michael J. Morrissey, Catherine M. Jackson, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Michael Morrissey and Catherine M. Jackson appeal the district
court’s order denying relief on a petition filed on behalf of a
third party under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Morrissey v. Jackson, No. CA-98-87 (E.D. Va. Mar.
12, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished